A Word from The Editor

Denise 2016People sometimes ask about me.  You can find more of me on Facebook via this blog, or click on the MadCat mask that’s my Avatar on WordPress.

The other question I get is “What made you decide to blog the writings of an Elizabethan cat?”  My friends tend to ask this in the pub, looking a tad dazed. And not because they’ve been drinking.

The answer is (of course) the discovery and decoding of the papers in my neighbour’s dress-basket.  But there’s more, which I’ll keep as short as possible.

In mid-2014 I was researching a topic that had nothing to do with either cats or Henry Wriothesley, 3rd Earl of Southampton, when I chanced upon a reference to his refusal to be married to Elizabeth de Vere.

She was the daughter of the 17th Earl of Oxford and granddaughter of William Cecil, Lord Burghley.  The Earl of Southampton was a teenager. William Cecil was his guardian and, as Elizabeth I’s chief adviser, the most powerful man in England.

Said I to my writing buddy, “That makes three things I like about the Earl of Southampton: he was a patron of Shakespeare, he had his portrait painted with a cat, and he said ‘No’ to William Cecil – not something many people would’ve done.”

Tower Portrait via Wikimedia Commons
The Tower Portrait

“Good for him,” said she, and we went on to discuss our current projects.

Later it occurred to me that was pretty much all I did know about the Earl.

I dimly recalled that, as a young man, he’d earned Elizabeth I’s hostility by secretly marrying his pregnant girlfriend.  And that he’d supported the Earl of Essex’s disastrous uprising in early 1601, but his death sentence was commuted to imprisonment. Hence his famous “Tower Portrait” with a cat.

I decided to find out more.  One search led to another, and then to a truly fantastic world.  Apparently, the Earl and William Shakespeare were an Item.

Few agree on what sort of an Item, but there are some amazing scenarios out there.  The Clues!  The Codes!  The Conceits!  Here are my three favourites.

The Love Triangle

Sonnets Title Page public domain Wikimedia CommonsShakespeare’s sonnets tell a story that reveals his heart.  He tries to talk a lovely lad (the Fair Youth) into reproducing (presumably within marriage), then declares his own love for him.  Alas, the ingrate reciprocates by stealing Shakespeare’s mistress.  She’s a Dark Lady.

Shakespeare gives his male beloved a few tellings-off (as only an aggrieved poet with an exquisite turn of phrase could), but stays friends with him.  That suggests the Fair Youth is rich.  Shakespeare also frets about a Rival Poet, presumably because he too is after financial handouts from said Fair Youth.

But, if the Fair Youth is the Earl of Southampton (as first suggested about 200 years after Shakespeare’s death) then who’s the Dark Lady?

That gets really complicated, because at least half-a-dozen Dark Ladies have been identified over the years.  I’m not going there.

Love Child #1

This may be the sequel to The Love Triangle, but I’ll be honest.  I haven’t read Professor Hammerschmidt-Hummel’s books about Shakespeare, or the Dark Lady.

The Countess of Southampton (nee Elizabeth Vernon) 1603.
The Countess of Southampton (nee Elizabeth Vernon).

However, I gather that when the Earl sneaks home from France in 1598 to marry the pregnant Elizabeth Vernon (historical fact), the child she’s carrying is not his but Shakespeare’s.

And Elizabeth Vernon is a Dark Lady.  Among others.

The child is a girl (Lady Penelope Wriothesley) who marries into the Spencer family. One of her descendants (Lady Diana Spencer) marries Prince Charles.

That means Prince William and Prince Harry are descended from Shakespeare rather than the Earl of Southampton.  Among many others, of course.

Love Child #2

The Earl of Southampton is the child of Elizabeth I, though it must have been a difficult labour because she never shows him special favour.  Apart from not cutting off his head when she has good reason to.  Any parent can identify with that.

The 17th Earl of Oxford is his biological father.

So where’s Shakespeare in all this?  Well, that depends on who you mean by “Shakespeare”.

The Usual Suspects: Oxford, Queen Elizabeth, Shakespeare, and Southampton.
A Tangled Web, via Wikimedia Commons: The Earl of Oxford, Queen Elizabeth, Shakespeare, and the Earl of Southampton.

jeune chat mau égyptienYes, the Shakespeare-and-Southampton industry is flourishing, and I hope to add my groatsworth.  (That’s two tuppence worths, in case you’re wondering.)

The documents in my possession are penned by at least one cat, maybe two, who had the run of several noble households and who must have been privy to Southampton family secrets.

Could Shakespeare himself have come to the attention of the Earl of Southampton’s cat(s)?

Certainly, if he was in their vicinity and gave them something nice to eat.  Or left his mark somewhere that offended them.

Cat in Tower Portrait public domain Wikimedia CommonsUnfortunately, Shakespeare left very few marks that are universally agreed to be his.

This has led to a different-but-related industry, namely the Shakespeare Authorship Question, so refer back to the Earl of Oxford.  Among others.

More Clues, more Codes.

One way or another, the feline observations I’m transcribing could provide the definitive answer.  I look forward to it.  And I’m looking forward to a truly luxurious old age regardless.

Who knows what price these smelly old papers might fetch, once I’ve finished with them?

21 thoughts on “A Word from The Editor

  1. Charlotte Latvala October 24, 2015 / 5:12 am

    I hope you don’t mind, but I nominated you for a Liebster award. Please feel free to accept or ignore at your leisure. (Personally, I would love more people to discover your blog!) Anyway, the details are at https://introvertsdictionary.wordpress.com/ Thanks and have a great weekend!
    Charlotte

    Liked by 2 people

  2. toutparmoi October 24, 2015 / 9:56 am

    Thanks for the nomination, Charlotte, and for your compliments on my blog. I can’t participate in Awards because my blog’s so single focus that interrupting Gib’s story with a post on a completely different topic wouldn’t work. But please don’t think I’m not grateful!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Claremary P. Sweeney October 25, 2015 / 9:39 am

    I’m adding my groatsworth, too -this is really interesting and shows how much research has gone into your work. Thanks for taking us all on such a merry adventure…Clare

    Liked by 1 person

    • toutparmoi October 25, 2015 / 9:45 am

      Thanks, Clare, but most of the credit belongs to Gib – he’s an eye witness to history. I only wish he was as interested in the people around him as he is in other cats and his career as a poet!

      Liked by 1 person

      • Claremary P. Sweeney October 25, 2015 / 10:26 am

        Roxie and ZuZu love Gib and Roxie really understands the emphasis on his career. She would love to have a book about her.

        Liked by 1 person

  4. Charlotte Latvala October 27, 2015 / 7:09 am

    I completely understand. I wrestled with how to do this on my dictionary as well. I hope Gib’s story eventually finds its way to a wide readership!

    Liked by 1 person

  5. leggypeggy February 13, 2016 / 11:12 pm

    What a wonderful premise for a blog. I know I’ll enjoy following along.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. M. L. Kappa April 11, 2016 / 1:07 am

    Hello! I chanced upon your blog attracted by your gravatar! But I find it fascinating, so I shall follow on your adventure. Pleased to meet you, Marina

    Liked by 1 person

    • toutparmoi April 11, 2016 / 1:21 am

      Hello to you. I’ve noticed your gravatar on other blogs I follow, so it seems we have similar interests.
      Cheers, Denise

      Liked by 1 person

  7. Timi Townsend July 29, 2016 / 4:31 pm

    A simply amazing blog. Kudos to you! As I mentioned in another comment on your recent post, I’m both a cat-lover and an aficionada of mysteries and all things Elizabethan, so your cunningly-wrought blog is a dish of cream I simply lap up! 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    • toutparmoi July 29, 2016 / 6:58 pm

      Glad you think it’s fun! I’m looking forward to spending a bit more time reading yours.

      Liked by 1 person

  8. Timi Townsend August 1, 2016 / 12:07 am

    Hi Denise! I just wanted to say how much I appreciate your reading and liking some of my posts, as well as your comment. Another blogger (also a cat person!) just commented today about how the blogosphere is great for getting to know people. I feel like you are one of the people I’m getting to know, and it is very gratifying. I look forward to our continuing enjoyment of each other’s posts!

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Val August 6, 2016 / 10:34 pm

    The Earl of Oxford, going by the portrait, looks to me like… well, not to put too fine a point on it… looks rather like… a woman. So, that could add another angle to it, could it not?

    I love the cat in the painting. Our feline friends have taken over the world, really, haven’t they?

    Liked by 1 person

    • toutparmoi August 8, 2016 / 4:02 pm

      The more feminine looking young man in the collage of 4 portraits – the one with the long curls – is the Earl of Southampton, aged 21. He does appear to have been a rather pretty youth, and also what we would call a late developer, which might explain his rather girlish looks.

      There are many who would like to believe Shakespeare was enamoured of him, even though none of their contemporaries seems to have spotted this source of potential scandal.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave your Mark

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s